THE
BLAMING GAME.
For
so many occasions, before and after the Nov elections, Donald Trump
and some people kept on pointing at China or Saudi Arabia as major
culprits in America “losing” its greatness. We chide Saudi
Arabia, currently #2 exporter of oil to the US, for earning billions
of moolah with “unfair” pricing of crude/petroleum. And China, oh
well. China. When the US was the boss of the allied world, I don't
remember many leaders complaining about steady stream of oil and oil
products and “stateside” stuff and things to their shores. In
fact, those baubles in a way were status symbols. Colonial mentality,
we call it back home. Caltex was the major source of gasoline.
Hershey's was like sweets of the gods. It's okay. No whining. I don't
think it is the fault of China or Saudi Arabia or Mexico or whatever
country why America's balance of trade sucks at this point. We choose
to import than to export; our 1 Percent opted to ferret those plants
to Guangzhou and elsewhere overseas than here. These countries or
their governments didn't invade or colonize America and forced us to
abide.
When
activists were massing at WTO to block globalization's “regulation”
of free market trades, not enough people were lobbying. But people
love Occupy's party than significant moves like the Battle of
Seattle. America's bipartisan Congress let China and Russia in at
WTO, and now non-OPEC countries like Russia want in the US/allies
market. Is it their fault? Was it the fault of Japan and Germany why
there were competition to Ford and Chrysler for car manufacturing
(and imports to US) years ago? Look at these—trinkets on retail
stores, gasoline at Exxon, or heating in your house. The American
mass gobble them up. Where do all these come from because we don't
want factories to ruin our environment, had to be spot clean? China.
Saudi Arabia. Canada. Mexico. Venezuela. Even coca and cocaine come
from Colombia, Peru and Bolivia; poppy seeds from Afghanistan and
Myanmar. Need I go on? Nope. I gotta vacuum the bathroom floor for
now...
WHAT
has happened to those who vowed to leave America in case Donald Trump
won?
They
say America is doomed so they thought of moving to countries where
people are happier. Or countries with better delivery of basic
services. Like Belgium, Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden. They have
better health insurance, food subsidies, free education, affordable
housing etc etcetera. True. But those amenities don't come easy.
Those countries also impose the highest taxes globally, around 50 to
55 percent. Sweden has the second highest income tax rate in the
world, and the highest in Europe, with a 56.6 percent deducted from
annual income. Though Swedes may be taxed heavily, sales on
residential properties are exempted from taxation there. That is, if
you still got enough money left to purchase a house. In Norwegian
jail, it's like taking a vacation in a resort--cells are equipped
with TV sets, there are awesome sports facilities and gym, and a
prison inmate bakes you birthday cake as well. The high tax rate is
justified for increased social program accessibility. It's like mom
gets your salary and pays all your basic necessity bills and
whatever's left is handed to you. Maybe no more money for iPhone 7,
sweet smoky herbs, and beers--unless mom says so based on her
accounting of your money. Want that? No? So maybe you wanna try North
Korea instead? Food and housing are extensively subsidized by the
state out there. Education and healthcare are free, and the payment
of taxes was officially abolished in 1974. Wanna go? Are you already
there?
FICTION.
NON-FICTION.
Doug
Stamper (played by Michael Kelly), Frank Underwood's unwaveringly
loyal chief of staff and confidant in “House of Cards” TV series
reminds me of George Stephanopoulos. Before Mr Stephanopoulos joined
ABC News, he was a top Democratic Party political advisor or
Communications Director for the 1992 presidential campaign of Bill
Clinton, subsequently becoming White House Communications Director,
then Senior Advisor for Policy and Strategy. He was just in his 30s
that time. He was actually the one running Press Relations matters on
Clinton's first term although Dee Dee Myers was officially the White
House Press Secretary.
The
World Trade Organization (WTO), an intergovernmental organization
which regulates international trade, officially commenced in 1995.
The US acted as a dominant power in international economy and
strongly supported an open system—with great interest in China
because it was one of the fastest growing markets for US goods and
services. Yet tables turned--export to import. US imports from China
almost doubled within five years from $51.5 billion in 1996 to $102
billion in 2001. China was admitted to WTO that year, 2001, thus
celebrating globalization as a slick way to regulate free market in
favor of the Greater Powers. The US imposed additional conditions on
China and so there were, from a Chinese perspective, both positive
and negative aspects linked with admission. George Stephanopoulos
left Clinton's administration in December 1996—as Chinese imports
start to pile up in US retails. (BTW Russia got in WTO in 2012.)
In
politics, there is always an unwaveringly loyal and brilliant shadow
who helps brainstorm and execute significant policies for their boss.
A Doug Stamper. A George Stephanopoulos. Should they stay or should
they go? One is fiction, the other is not. The non-fiction chose to
go.
NOT
ON THE SAME PAGE.
We
are not on the same page although we seem to be enjoying all possible
modes of communication. Tactical alliance. Tactical alliance between
(non)like-minded groups but aligned against a common foe won
revolutions and/or real changes in society (in the absence of a
revolution). One basic flaw of activism in America these days, I
observe, is the absence of such an "alliance." Take the
case of the Occupy movement in its nerve center in Manhattan. Very
basic flaw. Groundwork--groundworking for a very basic and simple
need. Bathroom access. Each Occupy/er could've easily been thrown to
a paddywagon and Zuccotti Park shut down on Week 1--for
health/sanitation reason. No significant support from residents and
local business to let activists in. And who let them in 24/7?
McDonald's across the street. The 1 Percent--the same "foe"
that the Occupy Movement targeted. That is a very basic flaw.
Cliques.
Sub-groups. There are so many little cliques. Equality won't happen
if it doesn't translate in wages, housing, social security benefits,
single parenthood subsidies etc etcetera. Meantime other groups fight
for local growers against the big guys. Others fight for immigration
rights. For LGBT rights. Environmental issues. Until activists come
gather as one and devise a way how to maximize advocacy, lobbying,
and grassroots empowerment, we will all be howling on our respective
corners in a small plaza called Freedom of Speech. Until we all get
tired or snow come falling down again. Next season of "Game of
Thrones" and "The Walking Dead" up next.
Who
wins with all these distractions? Of course we know. You know. Bills
remain. But Canada's borders aren't as accessible as it's hot prime
minister's smile is. We only have to google it. That is, if we still
got internet access.
THE DUDE Western Media Love to Hate: Vladimir Putin.
A
UPI news or analysis sort of explains, “Why Russian President
Vladimir Putin will fail.” Really? Currently, Putin enjoys an 85.9
percent approval rating among his people. Fueled by the 2000s
commodities boom including record high oil prices, under the Putin
administration from 2001 to 2007, the economy made real gains. In
2007, Russia's GDP exceeded that of Russian SFSR in 1990, having
recovered from the 1998 financial crisis and the preceding recession
in the 1990s. During Putin's first eight years in office, industry
grew substantially, as did production, construction, real incomes,
credit, and the middle class. To illustrate that economic gain, a
WNBA player who earns a max salary of $125k in the US takes home $5
million when playing in the Russian league. Russia entered WTO in
2012 as it overtakes Saudi Arabia as the world's #1 producer of crude
oil. Oil. Russia isn't going anywhere down. Putin may retire but the
Russians have arrived—stronger than before. Why can't these
so-called economic pundits focus on how superpowers could benefit
from each other for their people than continue to fuel quarrels and
“Cold War” level intrigue? And I'm not even talking about China.
No comments:
Post a Comment